Fact is always better than fiction. Here is a brilliant proposal from a Texas lawmaker who doesn't believe that he: "came from a salamander that came out of a pond":
http://www.news-journal.com/news/content/region/legislature/stories/03/16/0316creationinstitute.html
Earth to Representative Berman: you didn't come from the salamander. However, you and the salamander share a common ancestor or, more accurately, a "concestor". Don't you see any resemblance between the development of a foetus and a salamander?
>>Don't you see any resemblance between the development of a foetus and a salamander?
ReplyDeleteSo that's how you decided we came froma salamander? So water melons came from clouds too I guess. Besides, cloud and a watermelon are identical because they have similar water sequences.
That's not how science works brother.
Precious Child, the evolutionary connection is proven through tracing of mitochondrial DNA (please read Dawkins' The Ancestors' Tale), not visual similarity. My point is simply that there is a visual similarity, for whatever that is worth.
ReplyDeletePrecious Child: I don't know what science book you read, but your use of the term "water sequences" leads me to believe that it may have been written by Dr. Seus. A watermelon has water. So does a cloud. So does urine. A "water sequence" is a clip off Romancing the Stone.
ReplyDelete